Cart 0 Product Products (empty)
No products
To be determined Shipping
0,00 € Total
Prices are tax excluded
Product successfully added to your shopping cart
Quantity
Total
There are 0 items in your cart. There is 1 item in your cart.
Total products (tax excl.)
Total shipping (tax excl.) To be determined
Total (tax excl.)
Data sheet of Goat Anti-Mouse IgG F(ab')2 secondary antibody (Fluorescein)
| Brand | Abnova |
| Product type | Secondary antibodies |
| Reactivity | Mouse |
| Host species | Goat |
| Applications | IF,Flow Cyt |
More info about Goat Anti-Mouse IgG F(ab')2 secondary antibody (Fluorescein)
| Brand: | Abnova |
| Reference: | PAB10751 |
| Product name: | Goat Anti-Mouse IgG F(ab')2 secondary antibody (Fluorescein) |
| Product description: | Goat anti-mouse IgG recognizes mouse IgG F(ab')2 fragment. This secondary antibody was purified using immunoaffinity chromatography. The antibody is conjugated with Fluorescein. |
| Immunogen: | Mouse IgG F(ab')2 fragment |
| Form: | Lyophilized |
| Recommend dilutions: | FLISA (1:10000-1:50000) Flow Cytometry (1:500-1:2500) Immunofluorescence (1:1000-1:5000) The optimal working dilution should be determined by the end user. |
| Storage buffer: | Lyophilized from 0.01 M sodium phosphate, 0.15 M sodium chloride, pH 7.2 (10 mg/mL BSA, 0.01% sodium azide). |
| Storage instruction: | Store at 4°C on dry atmosphere. After reconstitution with 1 mL of deionized water (or equivalent), store at -20°C or lower. Aliquot to avoid repeated freezing and thawing. |
| Note: | This product contains sodium azide: a POISONOUS AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE which should be handled by trained staff only. |
| Conjugate tag: | FITC |
| Product type: | Secondary antibodies |
| Host species: | Goat |
| Antigen species / target species: | Mouse |
| Reactivity: | Mouse |
| Applications: | IF,Flow Cyt |
| Shipping condition: | Dry Ice |
| Publications: | Immunofluorescence using dichlorotriazinylaminofluorescein (DTAF). I. Preparation and fractionation of labelled IgG.Blakeslee D, Baines MG. J Immunol Methods. 1976;13(3-4):305-20. |