Cart 0 Product Products (empty)
No products
To be determined Shipping
0,00 € Total
Prices are tax excluded
Product successfully added to your shopping cart
Quantity
Total
There are 0 items in your cart. There is 1 item in your cart.
Total products (tax excl.)
Total shipping (tax excl.) To be determined
Total (tax excl.)
Data sheet of Goat Anti-Horse IgG F(ab')2 secondary antibody (Texas Red)
| Brand | Abnova |
| Product type | Secondary antibodies |
| Reactivity | Horse |
| Host species | Goat |
| Applications | IF,Flow Cyt |
More info about Goat Anti-Horse IgG F(ab')2 secondary antibody (Texas Red)
| Brand: | Abnova |
| Reference: | PAB10654 |
| Product name: | Goat Anti-Horse IgG F(ab')2 secondary antibody (Texas Red) |
| Product description: | Goat anti-horse IgG recognizes horse IgG F(ab')2 fragment. This secondary antibody was purified using antigen affinity chromatography. The antibody is conjugated with Texas Red. |
| Isotype: | IgG |
| Immunogen: | Horse IgG F(ab')2 fragment |
| Form: | Lyophilized |
| Recommend dilutions: | The optimal working dilution should be determined by the end user. |
| Storage buffer: | Lyophilized from 20 mM potassium phosphate, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.2 (0.01% (w/v) sodium azide, 10 mg/mL BSA, Immunoglobulin and Protease free) |
| Storage instruction: | Store at 4°C on dry atmosphere. After reconstitution with 1 mL of deionized water, store at -20°C or lower. Aliquot to avoid repeated freezing and thawing. |
| Note: | This product contains sodium azide: a POISONOUS AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE which should be handled by trained staff only. |
| Conjugate tag: | Texas Redâ„¢ |
| Product type: | Secondary antibodies |
| Host species: | Goat |
| Antigen species / target species: | Horse |
| Reactivity: | Horse |
| Applications: | IF,Flow Cyt |
| Shipping condition: | Dry Ice |
| Publications: | Texas Red, a hydrophilic, red-emitting fluorophore for use with fluorescein in dual parameter flow microfluorometric and fluorescence microscopic studies.Titus JA, Haugland R, Sharrow SO, Segal DM. J Immunol Methods. 1982;50(2):193-204. |